Introduction to Migrate Microsoft Access Database
There are a number of reasons why a business might consider migrating away from a Microsoft Access Database to an alternative option, and it is important to make the right choice. Here are some things to consider before making this business-critical decision.
Microsoft Access database is one of the best-known database applications. It is widely used by small, mid-sized, and large businesses.
The powerful, as well as versatile program, has remained highly famous with technical staff and end-users. This is due to its easy-to-use feature and ability to the needs of the business via the software’s infinite opportunities to customize.
However, it is common for businesses that depend on Access for their database needs to ask the question of whether there are better alternatives available. Here are some questions that will help you to make the right decision:
Is it essential?
The first question is to ask is whether it is essential for the business to choose Microsoft access migrate. Two question drive debate around the issue, including
Is access going to be around and supported?
Microsoft’s decision to backout support for Access Web Apps has fueled worries about whether Access is to be phased out.
It is impossible to be 100% sure; however, most commentators agree that it is not the case and not something one should be concerned about.
Is access up to the job?
To answer this question, it is essential to figure out some vital differences between Access as a web-based application as well as comparable cloud-based database applications, including Azure SQL Server. Here are some important differences:
Maximum size of the database
Microsoft Access comes with a maximum database size of 2GB. Azure SQL Server has the capability of five hundred times larger – 1 TB.
Maximum number of concurrent users
Microsoft Access database can cope with 255 users at the same time, but around 20 users are optimal. SQL Server provides unlimited numbers of concurrent users.
Microsoft Access comes with limited functionality to allow multiple people to input data. With SQL Server, there is no limit on several user inputting.
Microsoft Access was intended as a personal product. It is not suitable for enterprise-level applications. On the other hand, Microsoft Azure SQL Server was created for enterprise-level applications. It can be operated as Software as a Service (SaaS).
Microsoft Access is created for Windows-based end users. When it comes to Azure SQL Server, the database is separate from the front-end.
It means that a number of web-based front-end systems can be used to ensure the database can be reviewed on any operating system or device.
Further visit: Database Administrators Checklist for Database Hardening Best Practices
With all business-critical decisions, budget is highly important.
Access is affordable for individual users
One of the best advantages is that Access is a cost-effective solution for individual users.
Running access as a Web-app incurs prices
When installed as a web application, additional infrastructure costs are incurred, including servers as well as maintenance.
Access provides few economies of scale
Infrastructure costs are high for a minimal number of users. There are not any economies of scale to get with a number of users.
Depending on all these factors like how many database users you anticipate, geographical distribution as well as devices used, it can be cost-effective in the long term in order to operate a cloud-based service, including SQL Server. It may also allow costs to be scaled on the basis of how the database is to be deployed within your business.